00:00
00:00
Ryanson
My name is Jared, I'm 19, and I never fucking learned how to read

Ryan @Ryanson

Age 33

SCHOOL + ALSO PIZZA

oh shit i didn't fix this

Joined on 7/19/05

Level:
16
Exp Points:
2,562 / 2,840
Exp Rank:
22,547
Vote Power:
5.77 votes
Rank:
Civilian
Global Rank:
> 100,000
Blams:
10
Saves:
20
B/P Bonus:
0%
Whistle:
Normal
Medals:
523
Supporter:
2y 10m 25d

Harry Potter

Posted by Ryanson - August 9th, 2011


Looking back... I think I rather enjoyed the movies more than the books.

Not to say that the movies are perfect or that the books aren't magic beyond magic. I even admit to having read the books solely to watch the movies. I don't know, there's just something about the films that strongly affected, answer still affects me.

I feel so strongly about this that I'm willing to defend them. Not just why I prefer them, but any and all adaptational changes or problems you or others may have.

With a BLOG

:O

(Any problems you may have with the books, though, are your own and not eligible for debate)

So go on, Newgrounds. Try me.


Comments

They're both good. But did the last couple have to be in 3d? It annoys my eyes.

Only no. 8 (Deathly Hallows Part 2) was 3D, because it was too late to convert its immediate predecessor.

From what I hear, only one scene truly benefitted from 3D, which was the Gringotts scene.

Personally, unless I hear its worth sitting through the experience (like Avatar) I will do my best to avoid 3D. IMAX is better :)

My mistake. But yes, untll 3d costs the same as 2d, I don't give a crap.

deathly hallows pt 2 kicked ass i saw it twice

Same